Exclusively available inside The International Herald Tribune in Greece and Cyprus  
  Friday October 27, 2006 - Archive
Current Edition | Athens Stock Exchange | Useful Information | Greek Edition | Site Search  
  Search
Home page
ENGLISH EDITION
Date
27/10/2006  
Frontpage
News
Commentaries
S/E Europe
Features
Business. & Fin.
Arts & Leisure
Sports
Weather
Classifieds
Cartoon Archive
  RSS
INFORMATION
Company Profile
Health & Emergency
COMMENTARIES
Obstinacy behind a veil of diplomacy

By Giorgos Bourdaras

The European Union is debating the possibility of launching “direct trade” with the Turkish-occupied north of Cyprus. And it is taking the matter very seriously - not because it regards this as an important matter of principle but in order to cajole Turkey into fulfilling its obligations as an EU candidate state.

It is quite clear what is happening here and what is at stake: Ankara is insisting on the aforementioned exchange, and not because it is concerned about improving the living standards of the Turkish Cypriots. If it had been interested in that, then it would have withdrawn its occupying forces and the northern half of the island would have become part of the EU, along with Republic of Cyprus in the south, with all the economic benefits such a move would have entailed for the Turkish Cypriots.

Turkey’s stance on this issue speaks volumes about its outlook in general; having created an illegal “satellite” state in the northern half of Cyprus, which it has forcibly maintained for decades, Ankara now wants to don the facade of a serious diplomat and legitimize the situation.

The simple truth is that the Turkish Cypriots are not “isolated.” It is the illegal state created by the invading country which has been found in violation of international law in a series of decisions made by the United Nations Security Council.

In view of all this, if the EU approves a proposal for direct trade with the Turkish-occupied north of Cyprus, it will be acting illegally.

After all, who will be doing business with the EU if this move is implemented? It will not be a Turkish-Cypriot farmer or tradesman but the designated authorities of this illegal state.

Some commentators in Brussels and elsewhere maintain that the northern part of Cyprus is effectively part of EU territory, following the accession of the southern part of the island in 2004, and so the acquis communautaire should be compromised. But then these people need to explain how the EU can accept the presence of occupying troops on its territory, troops belonging to a country which hopes to join its ranks in the foreseeable future.

Print article | e-mail


[ Front Page ] [ News ] [ Commentaries ] [ S/E Europe ]
[ Features ] [ Business & Finance ] [ Arts & Leisure ] [ Sports ]
[ Subscriptions ] [ Editor ] [ Webmaster ]
Company Profile | Health & Emergency

Commentaries
The Cartoon Of The Day
50 YEARS AGO

October 26, 1956
COMMENTARY

Defeating the purpose
EDITORIAL

Deputies feather their own nests
OPINION

Obstinacy behind a veil of diplomacy

English Edition - Greece's International English Language Newspaper
Exclusively available inside The International Herald Tribune in Greece and Cyprus
© 2009 H KAΘHMEPINH All rights reserved.