Saturday May 30, 2015 Search
Weather | Athens
14o C
09o C
News
Business
Comment
Life
Sports
Community
Survival Guide
Greek Edition
How the EU got it so wrong in Ukraine

A pro-Russian armed man stands guard at a barricade near the state security service building in Slaviansk, Monday. The sticker on the rifle reads ‘Republic of Donetsk.’

By Thanos Dokos *

The rapidly unfolding crisis in Ukraine has become Europe’s most serious post-Cold War challenge since the Yugoslav Wars. Europe and the US have consistently underestimated and/or failed to understand Russian President Vladimir Putin and the “siloviki’s” objectives and ways of thinking. In the case of Ukraine, Europe has seriously mishandled the crisis. There was ample warning about Russia’s annexation of Crimea that went unnoticed. In 2008, for example, Russia had attempted to use Kosovo’s de facto independence after the NATO intervention as a justification for obtaining international recognition of Abkhazia and South Ossetia. Of course NATO argued that this was an “exceptional case” which should not set a precedent in international affairs. And upon comparison of the situations, no real threat against Russian-speaking citizens was documented in Crimea, whereas the Kosovar Albanian community was faced with a real security threat. Furthermore, during the 2008 war between Russia and Georgia, Putin sent a clear message that he was prepared to use military force to promote foreign policy objectives.

Despite US President Barack Obama’s “reset” of relations with Russia, Washington failed to take into consideration Russian interests and sensitivities in two other important cases: Libya and Syria. In the former case, Western powers (justifiably) went beyond the provisions of UNSC Resolution 1973 in supporting regime change in Libya, but completely ignored Russian interests in that country and Moscow’s need to be treated as an important player and given a seat at the decision-making table. Efforts to manage the Syrian civil war have been unsuccessful thus far for a variety of reasons, and US and European reluctance to intervene militarily in that conflict has given Putin the opportunity to win the first round, boosting both Russia’s international image and his own self-confidence.

The current political and economic crisis in Ukraine began at a time of limited US interest in the post-Soviet space (in the context of the strategic pivot to Asia) and of a deep, structural European crisis also affecting EU global and regional policies, including the rather limited political interest in and financial support available for the Eastern Neighborhood Policy. Under those unfavorable circumstances, the EU decided to make a rather half-hearted attempt to draw Ukraine – a country heavily indebted and highly dependent on Russian energy – closer to a European orbit. The financial support that would have been provided through the proposed agreement, in order to balance the costs of opening further the Ukrainian internal market to European firms, was so low that it would have guaranteed a deterioration of the Ukrainian economy in the short term, only for the country to enjoy some long-term benefits if all went according to plan. This European initiative obviously underestimated the perceived importance in Russian eyes of a friendly or, at worst, neutral Ukraine. Ignoring the fact that Putin had the motive, the means and the opportunity to react strongly to European openings toward Ukraine was a fundamental mistake at the strategic level. It was quickly followed by other tactical blunders.

First, European countries offered unconditional support to all opposition forces, irrespective of their ideology and democratic credentials, even to the extent of senior European politicians openly supporting the protesters in Maidan Square. Secondly, after the February 21 agreement, major EU countries acquiesced to the formation of a temporary government composed exclusively of pro-European (and essentially anti-Russian) political parties, without any participation of pro-Russian political forces. To make matters worse, a number of extremely radical politicians and parties either became coalition partners or were appointed to key positions by the new government, one of the first actions of which was to draft a new law (never ratified) that would limit the rights of Russian minorities.

It is of little practical importance that there was no real threat against the Russian minority either in eastern Ukraine or in Crimea. Putin never hid his intentions to rebuild Russia’s sphere of influence in the former Soviet space, and here the pretext was given to Moscow to move forward with a not very subtle, but well planned and executed military operation to reclaim Crimea. Of course, the Crimea referendum was illegal but so was – at least from a constitutional perspective – the overthrow of the country’s President Viktor Yanukovych, which provided Moscow with yet another convenient excuse to intervene.

It should also have been clear that Russia is not a postmodern power. Putin is playing by traditional foreign policy rules (the use of hard rather than soft power) and he would have jumped at the opportunity to retake Crimea and bargain with the West from a position of strength. At the same time he spectacularly improved his domestic standings by rallying the Russian population around the nationalist cause.

It is highly possible that Putin has miscalculated the long-term consequences of his actions, what effect a change of borders by force might have for multiethnic Russia and the impact on Moscow’s relations with former Soviet states where large Russian minorities reside. And he may miscalculate even further by continuing to destabilize eastern Ukraine while underestimating the political and economic vulnerability of Russia. And this will undoubtedly be an even more serious challenge for European security. To be more successful in the next rounds of this high-stakes game, it is of critical importance that the EU looks at its own management of the crisis and draws the necessary conclusions.

* Thanos Dokos is director of the Hellenic Foundation for European & Foreign Policy (ELIAMEP).

ekathimerini.com , Monday April 28, 2014 (18:15)  
Zenobia, Barbara, Christine and the general’s daughter
The eurozone’s ‘ambiguous’ architecture
Only Greece can end its miserable ´Groundhog Day´
FIFA and fair play
Panaritis appointed Greece´s IMF representative amid SYRIZA complaints
The appointment of economist Elena Panaritis as Greece’s new representative at the International Monetary Fund has prompted criticism from within SYRIZA, as well as from opposition parties. ...
Police confirm two arrested, one dead in raid to catch bank robbery suspects
Police confirmed on Saturday that they have arrested two men in a raid to catch the men suspected of carrying out 400,000-euro robbery last year. A third man died during the operation near V...
Inside News
Effects of potential Greek default for banks not clear, ECB´s Constancio says
The effects of a potential Greek default on the country's banks cannot yet be predicted, ECB vice president Vitor Constancio said on Saturday, stressing that he did not foresee a default. If...
German bonds seen resilient as Greece talks produce false dawns
Greece’s failure to win an accord with creditors to access bailout funds sent German government bonds higher for a second week. Their appeal as a haven offered the prospect of further gains ...
Inside Business
SOCCER
Wemmer pens three-year deal with Panathinaikos
German defender Jens Wemmer has signed a three-year contract for an undisclosed sum with Panathinaikos, the Greek Super League club announced on Friday. Right-back Wemmer, 29, has been playi...
SOCCER
Panathinaikos conquers PAOK through Tavlaridis goal
A Stathis Tavlaridis goal has brought Panathinaikos to practically within one point from clinching a spot in next season’s Champions League qualifiers, as the Greens made it three out of thr...
Inside Sports
SPONSORED LINK: FinanzNachrichten.de
SPONSORED LINK: BestPrice.gr
 RECENT NEWS
1. Effects of potential Greek default for banks not clear, ECB´s Constancio says
2. Panaritis appointed Greece´s IMF representative amid SYRIZA complaints
3. Police confirm two arrested, one dead in raid to catch bank robbery suspects
4. German bonds seen resilient as Greece talks produce false dawns
5. Checking lists of tax dodgers a slow process
6. Some blame EU Commission for Greek obstinacy in debt talks
more news
Today
This Week
1. Traffic accidents down in March
2. Greece open to compromise to seal deal this week, says interior minister
3. German bonds seen resilient as Greece talks produce false dawns
4. Some blame EU Commission for Greek obstinacy in debt talks
5. Police confirm two arrested, one dead in raid to catch bank robbery suspects
6. Charity funding to help students vie in Olympiads
Today
This Week
1. Hotel contracts with a ‘Greek default clause’
2. Some 300 mln left banks on Tuesday
3. Neither Grexit nor a dual currency will solve Greece’s problems
4. No more 'quick and dirty' fixes for Greece
5. Endless confusion and worry
6. Romantic notions meet reality
   Find us ...
  ... on
Twitter
     ... on Facebook   
About us  |  Subscriptions  |  Advertising  |  Contact us  |  Athens Plus  |  RSS  |   
Copyright © 2015, H KAΘHMEPINH All Rights Reserved.