Greek elections

What about the Greek elections? Give us a grade in terms of rhetoric and substance. From what I could understand of it, I would say «A minus» / «B plus» in terms of the presentation of the campaign to the Greek people. The press especially did a wonderful job of detailing the various issues. To me, it turned simply on the fact that the time had come for a change. I think both candidates did a good job presenting their views to the public. I think the debate needed to be restructured, that the debate was not helpful. Other than that, the stump-speaking I thought was clear, to the point, rhetorically effective. I liked the fact that the candidates were able to agree on things, like not to debate about the Olympics or Cyprus. It’s the sign of a very healthy democracy. But it in the end, I think most people would say it came down to the need for change, and to the fact that (current Prime Minister Costas) Karamanlis was a little more charismatic than (PASOK leader George) Papandreou and people were tired of the same party being in power and abusing the power a little bit. But that’s an amateur’s perspective, although I’ve been coming to Greece for nine or 10 years now. I truly love it here. One of the reasons is that I think the Greek people are extremely well educated and politically sophisticated compared to a lot of places.

Subscribe to our Newsletters

Enter your information below to receive our weekly newsletters with the latest insights, opinion pieces and current events straight to your inbox.

By signing up you are agreeing to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy.