OPINION

Make-or-break year for Turkey

An abrupt and unusual word buried in a European Union declaration on December 8 showed the mounting risks of a breakdown in Turkey’s EU membership talks. Ankara’s need to solve its problems with Cyprus, foreign ministers warned, has become «urgent.» Thanks also to Turkey’s failure to meet EU reform benchmarks since negotiations started in 2005, a showdown looks inevitable over the next year. Failure to reform and deep political polarization have led to a sense of lost direction in Turkey. Nationalism and human rights violations are again on the rise. As the adoption of EU norms looks more distant, ethnic tensions between Turks and Kurds have risen. The EU anchor of Turkey’s economic miracle this decade and the great progress made in a golden era of reform from 2000 to 2004 are at risk. For Europe, the costs of losing Turkey are higher than it thinks. European access to one of the biggest and fastest-growing nearby markets would become more difficult. The souring EU relationship has helped slow the bloc’s first effort to diversify away from Russian gas supplies with the planned Nabucco natural gas pipeline across Turkey. What’s more, an EU that proves unable to work on an equal basis with Turkey will deepen a belief in the Islamic world that the West rejects Muslims. In Cyprus, this situation shows how wrong the Greek-Cypriot leadership would be to believe that Turkey will sacrifice everything to get into the EU, or that pressure from the bloc can ever force Ankara to accept its demands; instead, it must do all it can to bring Turkey closer to itself and the European Union, through avoiding conflicts over contested territorial waters at home and ending the practice of blocking Turkey-EU negotiating chapters in Brussels. For its part, Turkey has long been wrong in its belief that the Greek-Cypriot position is the result of an EU policy; but stumbling EU-Turkey ties make it even more mistaken to expect that the EU can or will impose anything on the Greek Cypriots. The only way forward for Ankara is through winning Greek-Cypriot trust, keeping its navy out of contested waters, and doing all it can to show itself to be a good partner in future normalized Turkey-Cyprus relations. There are many reasons for this damaging EU-Turkey divergence. EU populations and politicians are cooler to enlargement than ever before. Sound arguments about Turkey’s long-term contribution to the bloc are losing ground to nostalgia for an idealized vision of a homogenous European past, along with fears about radical Islam and the potential loss of jobs to Turkish immigrants. In Turkey, disillusionment began with the EU’s 2004 admission of Cyprus as a divided state run by Greek Cypriots, when it was the Turkish Cypriots who had accepted – and the Greek Cypriots who rejected – the EU-backed United Nations peace plan. French and German attacks on Ankara’s right to join the EU further demotivated Turkish leaders, who slowed the adoption of EU law to a crawl. Additionally, half of the 33 negotiating chapters are now frozen for political reasons by the Greek Cypriots and the French. Prime Minister Recep Tayyip Erdogan angrily dressed down EU diplomats at an Ankara dinner in September, telling them the EU had got the «bucket stuck in the bottom of the well.» In such an atmosphere, Turkey-skeptic EU states, or perhaps Turkish politicians angry with Europe, may try to suspend the negotiations altogether. One pretext could be Turkey’s promise, made in order to win the opening of negotiations in 2005, to normalize relations and trade with Cyprus. When Turkey had failed to do so by December 2006, the EU said it would study the issue «in particular in 2007, 2008 and 2009.» Brussels’s warning that the issue is «urgent» implies that this ambivalent wording is now seen as a deadline. Paradoxically, this cooling of relations comes just as Turkey is showing how much it can do to complement EU goals. Ankara has played key roles in representing the EU point of view over Iran’s nuclear policy and nudging Lebanese factions toward compromise on a new president – actions which Brussels acknowledged in its 2008 Turkey progress report. It has mediated talks between Syria and Israel and opened up dialogue with both the Iraqi Kurds and even an old enemy, Armenia. In recognition of Turkey’s responsible foreign policy, the country was elected to a two-year seat on the UN Security Council. EU politicians must do their share to avoid a crisis. They should recognize their past mistakes on Cyprus, engage even-handedly in support of the promising new Cypriot talks in progress since September, and publicly commit funds to a future Cyprus settlement. The dangers of failure were highlighted last month when the Turkish and Greek navies and Greek Cypriot-chartered oil-prospecting ships sparred over territorial rights in the Mediterranean. Since 1963 the EU has repeatedly promised Turkey full membership once it meets all criteria. Now would be a good time to reaffirm this promise. Also, the EU would win by following the call of pro-Turkey EU states to deepen strategic dialogue with Ankara. Turkey should do its utmost to give arguments to the pro-Turkish EU presidencies of Sweden and Spain in 2009/2010. The government and opposition should overcome their mutual hostility, implement the long-delayed reform program, and relaunch work on a new, more democratic constitution. Unfortunately for Ankara, EU politicians care more about the anti-enlargement mood at home than about Turkey’s geostrategic role. Only a full adoption of European norms can prove that Turkey truly wishes to be part of the EU family. Hugh Pope is Turkey/Cyprus project director for the International Crisis Group and author of «Turkey Unveiled: A History of Modern Turkey.» The new Crisis Group policy report, «Turkey and Europe: the Decisive Year Ahead,» was published on December 15, available on www.crisisgroup.org.